Comparison · Last updated June 2026
AiPPT vs Gamma
AiPPT and Gamma both turn prompts into slides in seconds, but they solve different problems. AiPPT specializes in converting existing documents, PDFs, and URLs into formatted decks, while Gamma is a broader AI generator for decks, docs, and websites built from a blank prompt. Here is how they compare on free tiers, pricing, exports, and everyday use.
🏆 Who should choose which?
AiPPT
Gamma
Gamma
AiPPT
📊 Quick specs
Quick verdict
AiPPT wins if your main job is converting existing documents, PDFs, or URLs into a formatted deck fast. Gamma wins for nearly everyone else: it has the more generous free tier, a more polished all-purpose editor, and the ability to generate docs and websites in addition to decks. Most teams building presentations from scratch should start with Gamma; teams sitting on a backlog of reports and PDFs that need to become slides should try AiPPT.
AiPPT
AI presentation generator built for document-to-slides conversion
Free + credit-based paid
Full review →
Gamma
The all-purpose AI deck, doc, and website generator
Free, then from about $9/mo
Full review →What is AiPPT?
AiPPT is an AI presentation generator that specializes in converting existing content, documents, PDFs, and URLs into structured slide decks. It offers three creation modes (topic-to-deck, document-to-deck, and URL-to-deck) and uses a credit-based system across its free and paid plans. The free plan gives 140 one-time credits for decks up to 10 slides but does not allow export; paid plans unlock export to PPT and PDF along with larger slide counts.
What is Gamma?
Gamma is a widely used AI tool for generating presentations, documents, and simple websites from a single prompt or outline. It is known for a clean, flexible editor, strong AI-assisted design, and one of the more generous free tiers in the category (400 AI credits with no forced expiry on the initial allocation). Paid plans raise the monthly credit allowance and add advanced AI editing, branding, and collaboration features.
Key differences at a glance
Starting point: AiPPT is built around converting something you already have (a document, PDF, or URL) into a deck. Gamma is built around generating something new from a prompt or outline, though it can also import existing content.
Free tier: AiPPT's free plan grants 140 one-time credits for decks up to 10 slides but blocks export entirely. Gamma's free plan gives 400 AI credits and lets you export and share without paying.
Pricing model: AiPPT's pricing is credit-based and not consistently published in fixed USD amounts; check aippt.com/price for current regional rates. Gamma publishes clear monthly and annual USD pricing on gamma.app/pricing.
Output range: AiPPT is focused specifically on slide decks with PPT/PDF export on paid plans. Gamma extends beyond decks into documents and simple websites from the same editor.
Pros and cons
AiPPT
Strengths
- Strong document, PDF, and URL to slide-deck conversion
- Three distinct creation modes for different starting materials
- Free plan available to test the workflow before paying
- Large template library across business, education, and pitch categories
Limitations
- Free plan cannot export finished decks
- Exact USD pricing is not consistently published; confirm current rates on the vendor site
- Narrower focus than all-purpose AI deck tools
Gamma
Strengths
- Generous free tier with 400 AI credits and export included
- Generates decks, documents, and websites from one editor
- Polished, flexible AI editing and design controls
- Clear, published pricing with monthly and annual options
Limitations
- Credit consumption on lower tiers can limit heavy AI-editing use
- Higher tiers needed for larger teams or high-volume credit needs
- Less specialized than dedicated document-to-deck converters for import-heavy workflows
Pricing comparison
AiPPT AiPPT uses a credit-based pricing model rather than simple flat monthly fees. The Free plan includes 140 one-time credits for decks up to 10 slides, with no export available. The Plus plan includes 600 credits per month for decks up to 20 slides, and the Pro plan includes 1,200 credits per month for decks up to 50 slides, with PPT and PDF export unlocked on both paid tiers. AiPPT does not consistently publish fixed USD prices for Plus and Pro since rates vary by region and are rendered dynamically on its site; confirm current pricing directly at aippt.com/price before purchasing. Verified June 2026.
Gamma Gamma offers a Free plan with 400 AI credits and export included. The Plus plan starts at roughly $9 per month (lower with annual billing) with an expanded monthly credit allowance, and the Pro plan runs roughly $18 per month (also discounted annually) with a larger credit pool and more advanced AI editing. Gamma also offers a higher-volume Ultra tier and Team plans for organizations. Exact current pricing and any promotional rates should be confirmed at gamma.app/pricing. Verified June 2026.
Gamma's pricing is transparent and published in fixed USD amounts, and its free tier is more usable since it includes export. AiPPT's credit-based model can work out well for document-heavy conversion workloads, but you will need to check its site directly for current rates since it does not consistently publish fixed USD pricing. For team-by-team cost modelling, use our AI Cost Calculator.
Which tool should you choose?
Choose AiPPT if you…
- → You regularly need to convert existing documents, PDFs, or URLs into slide decks and want a tool purpose-built for that workflow, and you are comfortable confirming credit pricing directly on AiPPT's site.
Choose Gamma if you…
- → You want an all-purpose AI presentation tool with a genuinely usable free tier, a polished editor, and the flexibility to also generate documents and simple websites from the same prompt.
Not sure which fits your workflow? Take our AI Tool Finder Quiz for a recommendation based on your role and needs.
Bottom line: AiPPT vs Gamma
AiPPT and Gamma both use AI to speed up deck creation, but they are not direct substitutes for every use case.
Pick AiPPT for document-to-slide conversion workflows; pick Gamma as the default all-purpose AI presentation tool, especially if a strong free tier matters to you.
🔄 Switching? Keep in mind
If you start on AiPPT's free plan and hit the no-export limit, either upgrade to a paid AiPPT tier or move your source document into Gamma, which lets you export from its free tier immediately.
Frequently asked questions
Is AiPPT or Gamma better?
For most users building presentations from a prompt or outline, Gamma is the stronger all-purpose choice thanks to its generous free tier, published pricing, and broader output range (decks, docs, and websites). AiPPT is the better fit specifically when you need to convert an existing document, PDF, or URL into a deck.
Does AiPPT or Gamma have a better free plan?
Gamma's free plan is more usable day to day: it includes 400 AI credits and allows export. AiPPT's free plan gives 140 one-time credits for decks up to 10 slides but does not allow export at all, so you cannot download or share a finished deck without upgrading.
Can both export to PowerPoint?
AiPPT supports PPT and PDF export only on its paid Plus and Pro plans; the free plan has no export. Gamma allows export from its free plan onward, making it the easier option if you need to download a deck without paying.
Is AiPPT or Gamma cheaper?
Gamma publishes clear USD pricing (Plus from roughly $9/mo) and its free tier allows export, so it is easy to budget. AiPPT uses credit-based pricing that varies by region and is not consistently published, so confirm current rates at aippt.com/price before comparing costs.
Which is better for pitch decks?
Gamma is usually the stronger pick for polished pitch decks thanks to its design-led editor and export on the free tier. AiPPT is better when your pitch content already lives in a document or PDF that you want converted into slides quickly.
Related comparisons
See something wrong? Report an issue · Suggest a tool