Comparison · Last updated June 2026
Continue vs Cursor
Continue is an open-source AI coding assistant that plugs into VS Code and JetBrains and lets you bring any model, Claude, GPT, Llama, or a local Ollama instance. Cursor is a standalone AI-first editor (a VS Code fork) with tightly integrated agentic editing. Both put an AI pair-programmer in your workflow, but one is a free, customizable extension and the other is an opinionated, polished product.
🏆 Who should choose which?
Continue
Cursor
Continue
Cursor
📊 Quick specs
Quick verdict
Continue (ToolChase score 4.7/5) and Cursor (4.8/5) both deliver AI pair programming, but they take opposite philosophies. Continue is an open-source extension you install into VS Code or JetBrains and point at any model you like, including local Ollama models for fully private, offline coding. You only pay your own API bills (or run free local models), which makes it the cheapest and most flexible option. Cursor is a standalone AI-first editor, a VS Code fork with bundled frontier models and the most polished agentic editing experience available, composer, multi-file edits, and codebase-wide context that just work out of the box. Pick Continue for control and cost; pick Cursor for the smoothest experience.
Continue
Open-source, model-agnostic AI assistant for VS Code & JetBrains
Free OSS extension · Team $20/seat/mo · Company custom
Full review →
Cursor
AI-first code editor with deep agentic pair programming
Free Hobby · Pro $20/mo · Business $40/seat/mo
Full review →What is Continue?
Continue is an open-source AI code assistant that installs as an extension into VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. Its defining trait is model-agnosticism: you wire it up to whatever LLM you want, Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's GPT, Google's Gemini, open-weight models like Llama, or a fully local model served through Ollama, and bring your own API key (BYOK). That means you can code completely offline and privately, with no vendor sending your code to a third party. The extension offers chat, inline autocomplete, edit-in-place, and agent workflows, all configurable through plain config files. The core extension is free under an open-source license; Continue also runs a hosted Hub with a Team plan and CI/PR automation for organizations that want shared agents, access controls, and support.
What is Cursor?
Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code, so it inherits the familiar VS Code interface, extensions, and keybindings while layering deep AI integration on top. Its standout features are agentic: a composer/agent that can plan and execute multi-file changes, codebase-wide semantic context so the AI understands your whole project, fast Tab autocomplete, and inline edits triggered by natural-language instructions. Cursor bundles access to frontier models (from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others) so there's no API-key setup to start, paid plans include a monthly usage-credit pool, with an unlimited 'Auto' mode that picks a model for you. It's a polished, opinionated product aimed at developers who want the strongest out-of-the-box AI editing experience.
Key differences at a glance
Open vs closed: Continue is open-source and self-hostable, you can read, fork, and audit the code, and run it entirely with your own models. Cursor is a closed-source commercial product; you get a polished experience but no source access and a dependency on Cursor's infrastructure.
Extension vs full editor: Continue is an extension that lives inside your existing VS Code or JetBrains setup. Cursor is a standalone editor (a VS Code fork) you switch to, it replaces your IDE rather than augmenting it, which means a smoother integrated experience but a migration.
Model choice: Continue is model-agnostic with BYOK: use Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, or a local Ollama model, and even run fully offline. Cursor bundles frontier models behind a credit pool, less setup, but you're tied to the models and pricing Cursor offers.
Cost structure: Continue's extension is free; you pay only your own LLM API usage (or $0 with local models). Cursor charges flat subscriptions ($20 Pro, $40/seat Business) that bundle model access via a monthly credit pool, so heavy use can deplete credits.
Agentic depth: Cursor's composer/agent for planning and executing multi-file edits with whole-codebase context is widely considered best-in-class. Continue has agent and edit features too, but Cursor's are more refined and tightly integrated out of the box.
Privacy & offline: Continue can run with a local model through Ollama so your code never leaves your machine, ideal for regulated or air-gapped environments. Cursor sends context to its cloud for inference; it offers privacy modes but isn't a fully local solution.
Pros and cons
Continue
Strengths
- Free and open-source, audit, fork, and self-host the extension with no license cost
- Model-agnostic BYOK: use Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, or any model you prefer
- Runs fully local and offline via Ollama for private, regulated, or air-gapped work
- Installs into your existing VS Code or JetBrains IDE, no editor migration required
- No vendor lock-in; you control which models, keys, and infrastructure you use
Limitations
- Requires setup, wiring up API keys or local models is more work than Cursor's zero-config start
- Agentic multi-file editing is less polished than Cursor's composer
- You manage and pay your own LLM API bills, which can be unpredictable for heavy use
- Less hand-holding; the experience depends on which model you bring
Cursor
Strengths
- Best-in-class agentic editing, composer plans and executes multi-file changes with whole-codebase context
- Zero setup: bundled frontier models work immediately, no API keys to configure
- Polished, familiar VS Code-based interface with fast Tab autocomplete
- Free Hobby tier lets you try the editor before paying
- Flat, predictable subscription pricing with a bundled monthly credit pool
Limitations
- Closed-source and tied to Cursor's infrastructure, no self-hosting or code access
- Requires switching to a separate editor rather than augmenting your current IDE
- Credit pool can deplete on heavy frontier-model use, forcing Auto mode or extra spend
Pricing comparison
Continue is free at its core: the Continue IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains is open-source and costs nothing to install. You only pay for the LLM you connect, bring your own API key for Claude, GPT, or Gemini and pay that vendor directly, or run a local model through Ollama for $0 in model costs. For organizations, Continue's hosted Hub adds paid tiers: a Starter usage-based option (around $3 per million tokens), a Team plan at $20/seat/mo that includes $10 in credits per seat plus shared agents and CI/PR automation, and a custom-priced Company plan with SSO, access controls, BYOK, and enterprise support. Verified June 2026 from www.continue.dev.
Cursor offers a free Hobby plan with limited Tab completions and a limited number of agent requests, enough to try the editor. Pro is $20/mo (about $16/mo billed annually) and includes unlimited Tab completion, unlimited Auto mode, and a $20 monthly usage-credit pool for premium models. Business is $40/seat/mo and adds Pro-equivalent AI access plus admin controls, centralized billing, and shared team rules; all seats on a team must be on the same plan. Enterprise is custom-priced. Since mid-2025, paid plans meter premium-model use against the included credit pool, while Auto mode remains unlimited. Verified June 2026 from cursor.com.
Continue is dramatically cheaper to run if you supply your own models, the extension is free and a local Ollama model costs nothing, so a solo developer can pay $0 beyond their existing API usage. Cursor's flat $20/mo Pro bundles model access and a credit pool, which is simpler and predictable but a real recurring cost. For teams, Continue's $20/seat Team and Cursor's $40/seat Business price comparably once you factor in that Continue still needs model spend on top. For team-by-team cost modelling, use our AI Cost Calculator.
Which tool should you choose?
Choose Continue if you…
- → you want an open-source assistant with no vendor lock-in and full control over which models you use
- → you need to run a local model for private, offline, or regulated/air-gapped development
- → you'd rather keep your existing VS Code or JetBrains IDE and just add AI to it
Choose Cursor if you…
- → you want the most polished agentic editing experience with zero setup
- → you value best-in-class multi-file composer and whole-codebase context out of the box
- → you prefer flat, predictable subscription pricing with models bundled in
Not sure which fits your workflow? Take our AI Tool Finder Quiz for a recommendation based on your role and needs.
Bottom line: Continue vs Cursor
Continue and Cursor both put a capable AI pair-programmer in your editor, but they're built for different developers. Continue is the open-source, model-agnostic choice: free to install, BYOK, and able to run fully local through Ollama, which makes it the cheapest and most flexible option and the right call for anyone who cares about control, privacy, or avoiding lock-in. Cursor is the polished, opinionated editor: its agentic composer and whole-codebase context are best-in-class, and bundled models mean you're productive in seconds with no setup.
ToolChase scores Continue 4.7/5 and Cursor 4.8/5, Cursor edges ahead on out-of-box experience and agentic depth, while Continue wins on openness, model freedom, and cost. Pick Continue to own your stack and run any model; pick Cursor for the smoothest, most powerful AI editor with nothing to configure.
🔄 Switching? Keep in mind
Switching between these isn't a like-for-like swap. Moving from Cursor to Continue means installing an extension into your existing IDE and wiring up your own model keys (or a local Ollama setup), so budget time for configuration in exchange for control and lower cost. Moving from Continue to Cursor means migrating to a separate editor, though as a VS Code fork, Cursor imports your VS Code extensions, settings, and keybindings, easing the transition. Your custom Continue config, model choices, and any local model setup won't carry over to Cursor's bundled-model approach, and you'll trade BYOK flexibility for a credit-metered subscription.
Frequently asked questions
What's the main difference between Continue and Cursor?
Continue is an open-source AI extension you install into your existing VS Code or JetBrains IDE and point at any model you choose, including local Ollama models for offline, private coding. Cursor is a standalone AI-first editor (a VS Code fork) with bundled frontier models and best-in-class agentic editing that works out of the box. Continue is about control, model freedom, and low cost; Cursor is about the smoothest, most powerful experience with no setup.
Is Continue really free?
Yes, the Continue IDE extension is open-source and free to install for VS Code and JetBrains. The catch is that you bring your own model: connect an API key for Claude, GPT, or Gemini and pay that vendor directly, or run a local model through Ollama for $0 in model costs. Continue also sells paid Hub tiers (Team at $20/seat/mo, Company custom) for organizations that want shared agents, CI/PR automation, and enterprise controls.
Does Cursor have a free plan?
Yes. Cursor's Hobby tier is free and includes a limited number of Tab completions and agent requests, enough to evaluate the editor. To unlock unlimited Tab completion, unlimited Auto mode, and a monthly premium-model credit pool, you'll need Pro at $20/mo (about $16/mo annual). Business is $40/seat/mo for teams with admin controls.
Can I use my own models or run offline?
With Continue, yes, it's model-agnostic and BYOK, so you can use Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, or a fully local model via Ollama, which lets you code offline with no code leaving your machine. That makes it well suited to regulated or air-gapped environments. Cursor bundles its own frontier models and runs inference in its cloud; it offers privacy modes but isn't a fully local, offline solution.
Which is better for agentic, multi-file editing?
Cursor, generally. Its composer/agent for planning and executing changes across multiple files, backed by whole-codebase semantic context, is widely regarded as best-in-class and works with zero configuration. Continue has agent and edit-in-place features too, and they're capable, but they're less polished and depend on which model you connect. If agentic depth out of the box is your priority, Cursor leads.
Which is cheaper, Continue or Cursor?
Continue is cheaper to run if you supply your own models: the extension is free and a local Ollama model costs nothing, so a solo developer can pay $0 beyond existing API usage. Cursor charges a flat $20/mo Pro (or $40/seat Business) that bundles model access via a credit pool, simpler and predictable, but a real recurring cost. The tradeoff is setup effort and unpredictable API bills with Continue versus all-in convenience with Cursor.
Related comparisons
See something wrong? Report an issue · Suggest a tool