Rank Prompt
Paid · 7-day trialGEO rank tracker — monitor your brand inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini & Grok
⚡ Quick Verdict
SEO teams, in-house marketers and agencies tracking brand visibility inside ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews
Pure traditional-SERP rank tracking, technical SEO audits, or backlink analysis at scale (use Ahrefs / Semrush for those)
Starter $39.17/mo · Pro $71.25/mo · Agency $119.17/mo (annual billing)
No free plan — 7-day free trial + 50 bonus credits, credit card required
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini, Grok (all six on every plan)
Six-engine coverage at a lower entry price than Profound or AthenaHQ — plus an outreach module that ships citation pitches
Credit-based usage — heavy daily monitoring of many prompts will burn through Starter (150 credits) inside the first week
Peec AI, Profound, Otterly.AI, AthenaHQ
Bottom line: Rank Prompt scores 4.3/5 — a strong, mid-priced GEO tracker for teams who need full coverage of the major AI answer engines without paying enterprise rates. The credit-budget model rewards focused tracking (a handful of strategic prompts on a daily cadence) over spray-and-pray monitoring of hundreds of queries.
What is Rank Prompt?
Rank Prompt is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) rank tracker — a SaaS platform that monitors how often, how favourably and with what citations your brand appears inside AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini and Grok. Where traditional SEO suites like Ahrefs and Semrush measure rank position on Google's blue-link SERP, Rank Prompt measures something the next layer of search has invented: brand presence inside the synthesised answer itself, plus the citation links the AI chose to surface.
The product works by storing a list of prompts the user wants to track ("best CRM for solopreneurs", "alternatives to HubSpot", "is Notion AI worth it"), running those prompts against each AI engine on a scheduled cadence, and parsing every response for three signals: (1) whether the brand is named in the body of the answer, (2) where it ranks among the alternatives the model proposes, and (3) which URLs the model cites. Those signals roll up into share-of-voice charts, sentiment tracking, competitor benchmarks, citation source mix, and per-prompt visibility history. Each tracked run consumes credits from the plan budget, which is how Rank Prompt prices the workload.
Beyond passive monitoring, Rank Prompt ships four active modules. Agent Mode accepts free-form natural-language questions ("which competitor gained the most ChatGPT share this month?") and answers using the user's own tracked data; each plan has a small monthly Agent Mode budget separate from the prompt-tracking pool. Content Studio drafts blog posts, FAQs and listicles tuned for AI-citation patterns — heavy on entity mentions, structured comparisons and direct-answer paragraphs. Email Outreach turns "we should be cited here" intelligence into actual outreach: it identifies pages and authors that AI engines already cite for a given prompt, then drafts personalised pitches asking the publisher to mention or link to your brand. SEO Audits and Brand Audit round out the toolkit with on-page Lighthouse-style checks and a one-page summary of how each AI engine currently describes your brand.
Rank Prompt sits in a young but increasingly crowded GEO category. Direct competitors include Profound (the enterprise-tier incumbent priced for VC-backed brands), Otterly.AI (one of the earliest entrants, focused on AI Overview tracking), Peec AI (a freemium player with a generous starter tier), and AthenaHQ (a competitor positioned for marketing teams who already own a traditional SEO stack). Rank Prompt's positioning lands in the middle: lower entry price than Profound or AthenaHQ, broader engine coverage than Otterly's AI-Overview-first model, and a workflow that unifies tracking, content drafting and outreach into one credit pool.
Who should actually buy it? In our testing, Rank Prompt is the right pick for in-house SEO leads at B2B SaaS companies, content marketing teams at DTC brands, and small-to-mid-sized agencies servicing 5–25 clients who need GEO reporting alongside traditional SEO. It is overkill for solo creators (Otterly's free tier or Peec AI's freemium plan are friendlier), and underpowered for global enterprises tracking thousands of prompts across dozens of locales (Profound is the safer call there). Used inside its sweet spot — focused prompt sets, weekly or daily cadence, monthly outreach push — it is one of the better-priced ways to put a number on a previously invisible channel.
AI engines Rank Prompt tracks
Every paid Rank Prompt plan tracks the same six engines — there is no "premium engine" gate. What differs across plans is the credit budget, not the coverage.
The largest AI assistant by usage. Rank Prompt monitors ChatGPT's default web-enabled responses, parsing both the named brands inside the answer and the source URLs in the citation tray. This is the single highest-volume signal for most B2C and B2B SaaS brands.
The most citation-heavy answer engine. Perplexity surfaces 5–10 source links per answer, which makes it the cleanest place to measure citation share. Rank Prompt tracks both the cited domain mix and the rank order Perplexity gives each source.
The AI answer block sitting above Google's traditional SERP. Because AI Overviews trigger on a subset of queries (Google estimates ~15–25%), Rank Prompt tracks both whether AI Overviews fire on a tracked prompt and, if they do, whether the brand is named or cited.
Used heavily by knowledge workers, developers and inside enterprise tools (Notion, Slack, Quora's Poe). Claude does not cite as aggressively as Perplexity, so the dominant signal is brand mention inside the answer body rather than citation share.
Distinct from Google AI Overviews — this is the standalone Gemini app and API. Tracking matters here because Gemini integrates into Workspace, Android and Chrome surfaces, so a Gemini citation can affect anything from Gmail draft suggestions to Pixel device recommendations.
Native to X (Twitter) and bundled inside X Premium. Grok matters for brands with strong social distribution and for anything where freshness or contrarian framing changes the answer — politics, finance, crypto, sports, breaking news.
Key features
- AI Visibility Monitoring — scheduled prompt runs across all six engines, with share-of-voice, citation, and rank-position charts
- Agent Mode — natural-language analytical queries against your own tracked data (separate $5–$15/mo budget per plan)
- Content Studio — drafts blog posts, FAQs and listicles tuned for AI citation patterns (entity-rich, comparison-heavy)
- Email Outreach — identifies AI-cited publishers for a target prompt and drafts personalised pitches asking for a citation or backlink
- Brand Audit — one-click summary of how every tracked AI engine currently describes your brand, surfacing factual errors and stale claims
- SEO Audits / Lighthouse — on-demand technical audits of any URL (Core Web Vitals, on-page checks); ~5 credits per audit
- Scheduled Reports — recurring email digests for stakeholders (visibility deltas, top movers, new citations)
- Multi-location & multi-language tracking — run the same prompt from different geos and locales to capture regional answer variation
- Competitor tracking — pin 3–10 competitor brands per project and benchmark share-of-voice deltas over time
- White-label exports (Pro & Agency) — branded PDF reports for client deliverables
Rank Prompt pricing
Pricing verified May 2026 from rankprompt.com/pricing. All public tiers are billed annually; monthly equivalents shown.
| Plan | Monthly (annual billing) | Annual total | Credits / Agent budget | What's included |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $39.17/mo | $470/yr | 150 credits/mo · $5 Agent Mode | All 6 AI engines, integrations, outreach tools, SEO audits. ~150 prompts, 15 articles, or 30 Lighthouse audits per month. |
| Pro Most popular | $71.25/mo | $855/yr | 500 credits/mo · $10 Agent Mode | Everything in Starter + email outreach campaigns, white-label PDF exports. ~500 prompts, 50 articles, or 100 audits/mo. |
| Agency | $119.17/mo | $1,430/yr | 1,000 credits/mo · $15 Agent Mode | Everything in Pro + team collaboration, priority support. ~1,000 prompts, 100 articles, or 200 audits/mo. |
Free trial: 7 days with 50 bonus credits on every paid plan. Credit card required at signup; no charge until trial ends. No free forever plan — Rank Prompt does not match Otterly.AI's permanent free tier or Peec AI's freemium plan.
How GEO tracking actually works
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) tracking is to AI search what rank tracking is to Google. The mechanic is straightforward: Rank Prompt sends a fixed prompt to each AI engine on a schedule, captures the response, and parses it for brand mentions, ranking order and citation URLs.
- Prompt set-up. The user defines a list of "prompts" — the natural-language queries they want to monitor. Good prompts mirror real user questions ("best email tool for startups", "alternatives to Calendly", "is ConvertKit worth it"). 20–60 well-chosen prompts is more useful than 500 random ones.
- Engine fan-out. Rank Prompt sends each prompt to all six engines on a chosen cadence (daily, weekly or on-demand). Each run against each engine consumes one credit.
- Response parsing. The platform extracts every brand named in the response body, their order of appearance, the sentiment of each mention, and the URLs cited. This populates the share-of-voice and citation tables.
- Diff & deltas. Each new run is compared against history. The dashboard surfaces movers — brands gaining or losing share, new citation domains, and prompts where AI Overviews recently started or stopped firing.
- Action loop. Insights feed Content Studio (draft a missing FAQ that ChatGPT keeps citing competitors for) and Email Outreach (pitch the publisher whose page Perplexity keeps citing). This closes the loop from "what is happening" to "what to do about it".
What GEO tracking is not: it is not a real-time crawler of every conversation users have with AI. It is a sampling system — your tracked prompts are a panel, and the trends in that panel are your best available proxy for the much larger volume of un-trackable conversations happening in the wild.
Rank Prompt vs other GEO trackers
There are now four serious GEO platforms competing in this category. Here is how Rank Prompt compares, with verified pricing and positioning as of May 2026.
| Tool | Starting price | Free plan | Engines | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank Prompt | $39.17/mo | No (7-day trial) | 6 (all majors) | Mid-market SEO teams & agencies wanting tracking + outreach in one credit pool |
| Profound | Custom (enterprise) | No | All majors | VC-backed brands and global enterprises with five-figure GEO budgets |
| Otterly.AI | Free → ~$29/mo | Yes (limited) | Focused on AI Overviews + ChatGPT/Perplexity | Solo SEOs and small teams who need cheap, AI-Overview-first tracking |
| Peec AI | Freemium | Yes | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini focus | Indie hackers and content sites starting to measure AI traffic |
| AthenaHQ | ~$200+/mo (verify) | No | Major engines | Marketing teams who already own a Semrush/Ahrefs stack and want a bolt-on GEO layer |
Where Rank Prompt wins: the entry price beats Profound and AthenaHQ, the engine coverage beats Otterly's narrower model, and the bundled outreach module is a feature neither Otterly nor Peec ships. Where it loses: Otterly is genuinely cheaper for solo users, Peec has a more generous free plan, and Profound has the deeper enterprise feature set (custom panels, SSO, dedicated CSM).
Rank Prompt vs traditional SEO tools
A common question from buyers: "I already pay for Ahrefs or Semrush — do I really need a separate GEO tool?" The honest answer: yes, because they measure different surfaces.
- Ahrefs / Semrush measure rank position on Google's traditional 10 blue links and (increasingly) on AI Overviews via their experimental modules. They are still the right tools for keyword research, backlink analysis, technical SEO and traditional rank tracking.
- Surfer SEO (our review) optimises individual pages for Google ranking through NLP-driven content scoring. It is a content-quality tool, not a visibility tracker.
- Alli AI (our review) automates on-page SEO fixes for traditional Google ranking. Same SERP, different layer.
- Rank Prompt measures something none of the above measure: brand presence inside synthesised AI answers across six engines. The overlap with Ahrefs/Semrush is minimal — these are complementary tools, not substitutes.
A typical 2026 SEO stack for a serious B2B SaaS company looks like: Ahrefs or Semrush for keyword + backlink data, Surfer SEO for on-page optimisation, and Rank Prompt (or a peer GEO tracker) for AI search visibility. Total cost lands around $300–$500/month for a single brand — defensible if AI search is meaningfully driving consideration in your category.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Six-engine coverage on every plan — no premium engine gating
- Lower entry price ($39.17/mo) than Profound or AthenaHQ
- Bundled outreach module turns insights into citation pitches
- Brand Audit surfaces factual errors AI engines repeat about you
- Multi-location and multi-language tracking on the Starter plan
- Credit pool is unified — same credits buy prompts, audits or articles
- White-label PDF reports on Pro & Agency for client deliverables
Cons
- No free forever plan — only a 7-day trial, credit card required
- Credit-based pricing punishes users who want to track many prompts daily
- Annual billing only at the listed prices — monthly billing is meaningfully more expensive (verify current month-to-month rates)
- Younger product than Otterly or Profound — fewer integrations and a thinner historical dataset
- Agent Mode budget is small ($5–$15/mo); heavy analytical use will hit the cap
- No SSO or SOC 2 documentation publicly listed — enterprises will need to ask
Best for
📋 Good to know
Web-based; no install. Add your domain, add 3–10 competitors, paste 20–60 tracked prompts, choose cadence. The first run typically completes within 30 minutes for a Starter-sized prompt list.
Tracked prompts are sent to each AI vendor's API under Rank Prompt's account, not yours. The platform stores response transcripts; review the privacy policy if you plan to track prompts containing customer or proprietary data.
Move from Starter ($39.17) to Pro ($71.25) when (a) you're consistently exhausting 150 credits before month-end, or (b) you want email outreach campaigns and white-label client reports. Move to Agency ($119.17) when you have multiple seats or 5+ client brands.
Low for tracking, moderate for outreach. The dashboards are conventional SEO-tool UI. The Content Studio and Email Outreach modules require a few hours of practice to write good prompts and pitch templates.
Annual plans run for the term you pay for. There is no documented public refund window beyond the 7-day trial — confirm with support before committing if mid-term cancellation matters.
🔄 Alternatives by use case
Explore more
FAQ
What is Rank Prompt?
Rank Prompt is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) rank tracker. It monitors how often your brand or domain is named, ranked and cited inside AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini and Grok. It is the AI-search equivalent of what Ahrefs and Semrush do for Google's traditional 10 blue links — but for the synthesised answer above (or instead of) the SERP.
How much does Rank Prompt cost?
Rank Prompt has three public plans, all billed annually: Starter at $39.17/mo ($470/year, 150 monthly credits, $5/mo Agent Mode), Pro at $71.25/mo ($855/year, 500 credits, $10 Agent Mode, plus email outreach and white-label exports), and Agency at $119.17/mo ($1,430/year, 1,000 credits, $15 Agent Mode, plus team collaboration and priority support). Verified May 2026 from rankprompt.com/pricing.
Is Rank Prompt free?
No — there is no free forever plan. Every paid plan does include a 7-day free trial with 50 bonus credits, but a credit card is required at signup. If you specifically need a free GEO tracker, look at Otterly.AI's free tier or Peec AI's freemium plan instead.
How does GEO tracking actually work?
Rank Prompt sends each of your tracked prompts to all six AI engines on a schedule (daily, weekly or on-demand). Each run consumes one credit. The platform parses every response for brand mentions, the order brands appear in, sentiment, and citation URLs, then aggregates those into share-of-voice charts, citation source tables and competitor benchmarks. It is a sampling system: your tracked prompts are a panel that approximates the much larger volume of real user conversations.
Is GEO just SEO for AI?
Partly. The goals overlap (be visible when buyers research) but the tactics are different. Traditional SEO optimises a single page for a single Google query. GEO optimises across multiple engines (each with its own training data and citation behaviour), rewards entity richness and structured comparisons more than keyword density, and treats being named in an answer as a higher-value outcome than ranking #4 on a blue-link SERP. The two stacks are complementary: keep your Ahrefs/Semrush subscription, add Rank Prompt for the GEO layer.
Which AI engines matter most for my industry?
B2C / DTC brands typically over-index on ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews — that is where general consumers ask "best X for Y". B2B SaaS brands see meaningful traffic from Perplexity (researchers, analysts) and Claude (knowledge workers using Notion, Slack, Poe). News, finance and political brands need to track Grok because of its X integration. Multi-language and multi-region brands should not skip Gemini, which dominates inside Google Workspace and Android. Rank Prompt tracks all six on every plan, so you do not have to commit to one engine's bet.
Rank Prompt vs Otterly.AI — what's the difference?
Otterly.AI was one of the first GEO trackers and is the cheapest serious option, with a permanent free tier and paid plans starting around $29/month. Its focus is narrower: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity, with less depth on Claude, Gemini and Grok. Rank Prompt costs more ($39.17/mo Starter) but covers all six engines uniformly and bundles Email Outreach and Content Studio modules that Otterly does not ship. Pick Otterly if you are a solo SEO with a tight budget; pick Rank Prompt if you want six-engine coverage and an outreach workflow.
Rank Prompt vs Profound — what's the difference?
Profound is the enterprise leader in GEO — well-funded, used by VC-backed brands and global enterprises, and priced accordingly (custom contracts typically in the four- to five-figure monthly range). Rank Prompt is the mid-market alternative: same broad capability, a published price list starting at $39.17/mo, and a self-serve sign-up. If your GEO budget is approved by procurement, Profound is the safer enterprise pick. If your GEO budget lives inside the marketing team and needs to be defensible at sub-$200/month, Rank Prompt is the better fit.
Rank Prompt vs Peec AI — which should I pick?
Peec AI runs a freemium model and is the friendliest entry point if you have never tracked GEO before. Its engine coverage skews toward ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. Rank Prompt is paid-only after the 7-day trial but gives you six engines, deeper credit budgets, and outreach + content modules. Start with Peec to see whether GEO matters for your category; graduate to Rank Prompt when you need to track 50+ prompts and build outreach off the data.
Do I still need Ahrefs or Semrush if I use Rank Prompt?
Yes. Rank Prompt does not do keyword research, backlink analysis, technical site audits or traditional Google rank tracking — those remain Ahrefs and Semrush territory. Think of Rank Prompt as a parallel tracker for a parallel surface (AI answers), not a replacement for the traditional SEO suite. Most serious 2026 SEO stacks include both: Ahrefs or Semrush for keyword + backlink + traditional rank, plus Rank Prompt for AI search visibility.
How are credits consumed in Rank Prompt?
Rank Prompt uses a unified credit pool that is consumed by three workloads. Roughly: 1 credit per prompt run per engine (so daily tracking of 5 prompts across 6 engines = 30 credits/day, or 900/month — already over the Starter cap), ~10 credits per Content Studio article draft, and ~5 credits per Lighthouse-style SEO audit. The Agent Mode budget is separate and runs out independently. Plan size is best chosen by counting how many prompts × how many engines × how many runs per month you actually need.
How accurate is AI-search rank tracking?
It is directionally accurate, not absolutely accurate. AI engines return different responses to the same prompt across users (personalisation, A/B tests, model versions), so any GEO tracker — Rank Prompt, Profound, Otterly, Peec — gives you a sample. The numbers are most reliable as relative measurements (your share of voice this week vs last week, or you vs your top three competitors) rather than absolute ground truth. Treat GEO data the way you treat survey data: directional, useful, never definitive.
Does Rank Prompt offer a white-label option for agencies?
White-label PDF exports are included on the Pro ($71.25/mo) and Agency ($119.17/mo) plans. Reports can be branded with your agency logo and re-themed for client deliverables. This is a meaningful productisation lever — most agencies sell GEO as a $1,500–$5,000/month retainer line item, so the white-label cost is recouped on a single client.
Is Rank Prompt worth it?
For the right user, yes — and the "right user" is now a wider band than it was a year ago. If AI search is plausibly driving consideration in your category (most B2B SaaS, DTC, professional services, finance and travel verticals qualify), then having any number on AI visibility is better than having none. At $39.17–$119.17/month Rank Prompt is one of the cheapest credible ways to get that number, and the bundled outreach module makes it more actionable than pure-tracking peers. It is not worth it for solo creators on a sub-$30 budget (use Otterly.AI's free tier) or for global enterprises with five-figure GEO budgets (use Profound).